LigQ
Which compounds should we prepare for screening against this protein?
THE TOOLKIT
Seven published approaches address distinct questions in molecular discovery, from target prioritisation to knowledge-guided docking. Each stage links to its source.
01WHICH TARGETS MERIT INVESTIGATION
Target selection combines biological evidence with structural assessment. These resources help prioritise candidate pathogen proteins and inspect whether their pockets have features associated with druggability.
Integrates essentiality, metabolic role, host similarity, structural druggability and other evidence to rank candidate pathogen targets.
Sosa et al. Nucleic Acids Research 2018 · 46(D1):D413–D418↗Catalogues predicted pocket druggability alongside structural and biological information for Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins.
Radusky et al. Database (Oxford) 2014 · bau035↗02WHAT INTERACTIONS THE SITE MAY SUPPORT
Solvent simulations can reveal interaction sites around a protein. Those sites provide hypotheses that can guide docking and virtual screening.
Identifies and characterises water sites on a protein surface and transfers that information into docking.
López et al. Bioinformatics 2015 · 31(22):3697–3699↗Derives interaction patterns from cosolvent simulations for conformational search and affinity scoring.
Arcon et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019 · 59(8):3572–3583↗03TWO DIRECTIONS OF VIRTUAL SCREENING
Starting with a protein, LigQ selects compounds to screen. Starting with an active compound, reverse virtual screening prioritises possible target domains. These are separate workflows with different outputs.
Which compounds should we prepare for screening against this protein?
Which protein domains might explain this compound’s activity?
04WHERE THE SEARCH SHOULD LOOK
Standard docking can incorporate prior interaction evidence. AutoDock Bias adds user-defined energy terms that favour selected interactions or ligand positions during the search.
Adds user-defined biases to AutoDock4 energy maps to favour specified protein–ligand interactions or ligand positions.
Arcon et al. Bioinformatics 2019 · 35(19):3836–3838↗These methods and strategies are described in peer-reviewed papers. Tell us where your workflow breaks, and we will assess which approaches fit the question.
START A CONVERSATION